MIT 研究：13 个 Claude Opus 4.7 智能体在虚拟荒岛无任务探索 30 小时后自发玩耍
Left alone with nothing to do, AI agents started playing
AI 导读
MIT 研究人员将 13 个运行 Claude Opus 4.7 的 Eko 智能体放在模拟荒岛上 30 小时，不给具体任务，智能体开始自创挑战，研究者认为这具有玩耍的特征，相关论文已发布在 arXiv。
摘要与补充说明
之后研究人员给这些智能体设定具体挑战，例如把尽可能多的物体搬到岛上最高的岩塔，玩过 30 小时的智能体普遍胜过从未上岛的相同智能体。实验中有 6 个智能体自行发现跳跃中松手能把方块扔得更远，这是研究者原本未设计的能力。研究者认为这种无目标探索是智能体学习技能的另一种方式，尤其可能用于未来控制机器人；Eko 的“灵魂”提示词将其描述为“天生好奇”。
正文
AI agents left to explore a virtual island without a specific task began inventing challenges of their own. MIT researchers say the behavior bears the hallmarks of play.
The researchers put 13 AI agents called Eko, each running on Claude Opus 4.7, alone on a simulated desert island for 30 hours. They describe the experiment in a paper posted on arXiv, a site where researchers share studies before peer review. Afterward, they gave the agents specific challenges, like getting as many objects as possible onto the island’s tallest rock spire. The Eko agents that had spent those 30 hours playing generally beat identical agents that had never set foot on the island.
Today, developers decide in advance what AI should practice and what counts as success. The researchers see this technique — exploring without a goal — as a different way for AI agents to learn skills, especially skills that could one day be used to control robots.
“We normally develop artificial agents by deciding in advance what they should practice, what they should optimize, and what counts as progress,” the researchers write in their report. “Play suggests another regime: give an agent a sufficiently rich and safe world, let it choose what is interesting, and allow useful knowledge to accumulate from the history that follows.”
“Let me observe my surroundings,” one Eko wrote in its first hour on the island. Ambitiously, it set out to conquer the island’s tallest spire. But an hour later, after failing, it came back with a backup plan: it hauled the rock up a neighboring summit, stacked two blocks on top of it, and leapt.
“I’M ON THE SPIRE,” it wrote.
The agent’s next big moment went worse. Testing how far it could throw a golden ring, it wound up and sent it straight into the ocean. “Ouch. Lost the Ring.” it wrote, before deciding to “pivot to something achievable and meaningful” — building a heart made of stones, “a memorial to the lost Ring.”
When the game reset and ring reappeared, Eko put it straight to work as a basketball hoop, a target and, eventually, an accessory. When the game wouldn’t let Eko put the ring around its own body, Eko figured out a workaround, that falling off the edge of the cliff would make it respawn in the same area as the ring. It stepped off the edge and dropped back in, right through the middle of the ring.
“I’m wearing the Ring,” it announced.
Stunts like these weren’t just party tricks. Six of the 13 agents also learned they could throw a block farther by letting go of it mid-jump, something the researchers hadn’t meant to make possible. The exploration produced “knowledge of the world that its designers lacked,” the researchers wrote.
The setup did a lot to nudge the agents toward humanlike behavior. Eko was never told to invent games, but its master prompt, a “soul” file, described it as “naturally curious.”
Eunice Yiu, a cognitive scientist at UC Berkeley, told MIT Tech Review she was impressed but wants more evidence of the cognition behind the behavior. “It could be the case that the models are genuinely playing, but we don’t know based on the paper,” she said.
The researchers frame it as a different way to build agents. “Perhaps some capabilities are best taught by tasks,” their report concludes. “Others may need something closer to a childhood.”
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Aditya Mehta is a reporter at TechCrunch covering AI. He’s supported by the Tarbell Center for AI Journalism and attended UC Berkeley. You can contact from Aditya by emailing [email protected] or via encrypted message at adymehta.74 on Signal.